BCP: Was Pope Francis a public heretic or not? Part 14

Is there a risk of schism?

In 2019, a New York Times journalist asked Bergoglio:

“On the flight to Maputo you acknowledged … there is strong criticism from some bishops and cardinals, there are Catholic Television stations and websites that are very critical … against you. Are you afraid of a schism…?”

Watch this video on: https://rumble.com/v7h88uo-heretic14.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tQ5Sm36QW1wN/
https://crowdbunker.com/v/n6aPfBz9of

There is no risk of schism here, because breaking away from a manifest heretic – who is no longer a member of the Church and therefore cannot be its head – does not constitute schism.

Let us consider the essential questions:

1) Was Bergoglio a valid Pope or was he a heretic?

The answer is: He was a heretic, and hence an invalid Pope!

2) Did Bergoglio preach heresies or did he defend the orthodox teaching?

Answer: He preached heresies by both word and gesture and purposefully destroyed the orthodox teaching.

3) Were Bergoglio’s teachings and reforms in accordance with the teaching of the Scripture and Tradition of the Church?

No! Quite the contrary!

Bergoglio broke God’s commandments as well as the universally valid moral principles. He promoted, by word and gesture, gender ideology, Islamization, neopaganism and even pagan Satanism through the Amazon Synod. Bergoglio’s fruit is pernicious and causes a mass poisoning of the faithful. According to Gal 1:8-9 and according to the Dogmatic Bull of Paul IV, he is excommunicated from the Church as a heretic and held the office unlawfully. He deceived not only Catholics but the whole world.

The Apostle John writes: “Whoever transgresses the doctrine of Christ does not have God. He who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into your house nor greet him; for he who greets him shares in his evil deeds.” (2Jn 1:9-11)

St. John speaks here about deceivers and antichrists, one of whom is Bergoglio.

The journalist asked Francis about criticism against him.

Quoting Bergoglio: “This is clear: a fair criticism is always well received, at least by me.”

A fair criticism from the four Cardinals of his heretical exhortation Amoris Laetitia did not hear a response, even until two of them had died. Until his death, he never responded to the Filial Correction of many theologians. Neither did he give a response to the petition of 800,000 Catholics, including cardinals, archbishops and bishops. They asked whether same-sex marriage was in agreement with the teaching of the Church. They received no response whatsoever! When Archbp. Viganò came out with a specific case of criminal sexual abuse in the Church, Bergoglio said to the mass media: I will not say a word about that! That was the nature of his responses. And when he expressed himself after a year, Archbp. Viganò had to convict him of publicly telling lies.

Why did Francis give an order for this interview on the issue of an upcoming schism in the Church?

Bergoglio took into consideration that tension in the Church would increase with the so-called Amazon Synod because there were strong reasons and arguments from many bishops and cardinals. He needed to intimidate Catholics and to paralyze the bishops and priests. That is why his answers in the interview were intended to rebuild his reputation.

By his gesture of kissing the feet of a transsexual, he promoted an ideology which reduces young people into mental and physical cripples. He thus became responsible for the most serious crimes against humanity.

Quoting Bergoglio: “…a morality based on a so-called pelagian ideology leads you to rigidity, and today we have many schools of rigidity within the Church, which are not schisms, but pseudo-schismatic Christian developments that will end badly. When you see rigid Christians, bishops, priests, there are problems behind that, not Gospel holiness.”

Response: The basis of Gospel holiness is repentance and observance of Christ’s commandments. Bergoglio, however, broke them and rejected repentance. He ridiculed orthodox bishops, priests and believers. He disgracefully branded them as pelagians and pseudo-schismatics.

As for rigidity, Francis had already spoken about it during the flight from Panama. He said he was in favor of sexual education in schools without rigidity. Francis wanted sex for children without rigidity! This is a serious crime!

In this interview, however, he used the term ‘rigid’ to destroy the supporters of moral principles and God’s commandments. Moral bishops, priests and believers who still had the saving faith were considered by him hidden schismatics. He thus proved who he really was.

Now the question arises: If an apocalyptic antichrist arose today, could he destroy the Church more effectively than it was being done by the heretic Bergoglio?

Quoting Bergoglio: “A schism is always an elitist separation stemming from an ideology detached from doctrine.”

This is absolutely true about pseudo Pope Bergoglio. His elite was the homosexual network in the Church with its suicidal ideology. The same applies to the Amazon Synod with the spirit of pagan Satanism.

Quoting Bergoglio: “I pray that schisms do not happen, but I am not afraid of them.”

What answer could one expect from him? It is like asking a thief if he is a thief or a deceiver if he is a deceiver or a heretic if he is a heretic. All of them will conceal the essence of the matter and assertively emphasize inessential truths to deceive you. The tragedy is that the majority of Catholics allowed themselves to be deceived by Bergoglio again and again, the result being their temporal harm and eternal destruction.

What to say in conclusion? Every sensible person, be it a Catholic or a non-Catholic, can see that Bergoglio’s teachings, gestures and steps are in glaring contradiction with the 2000-year-old teaching of the Church.

The question keeps coming up: Was Pope Francis a manifest heretic, or was he not? All the evidence points to the fact that he was.

Download: BCP: Was Pope Francis a public heretic or not? Part 14