BCP: Was Pope Francis a public heretic or not? Part 6
Blessings for same-sex couples
God allowed Bergoglio’s heretical activity to become extremely evident in the doctrinal declaration Fiducia Supplicans, which ecclesiastically legalizes the so-called blessing of sodomite couples.
What is Scripture’s position on sodomy? The Old and New Testaments warn all generations against this outrageous sin with warnings of punishment. For this sin, God did not send blessing but punishment upon the inhabitants of Sodom, namely fire from heaven. This was followed by eternal fire for the unrepentant Sodomites.
With this doctrinal document, Bergoglio officially proclaimed the sodomite anti-gospel, for which, according to Galatians 1:8-9, a person is punished with anathema and the hardened with eternal fire (Jud 1:7).
What manipulative method did Bergoglio use in the document? He cunningly divided the blessings into so-called liturgical and other blessings. Then he quoted the teaching of the Church: “Therefore, the Church does not have the power to impart a liturgical blessing on irregular or same-sex couples.” He thus set the minds of genuine Catholics at ease, making them believe that the document respects the teaching of the Church. However, he then added: “It is necessary to avoid the risk of reducing the meaning of blessings … (12)” He used this manipulation to approve blessings for sodomite couples and to legalize the sin of sodomy.
The Church’s blessing of sodomites is a public outrage to Christians and non-Christians alike. Insisting that this so-called “blessing” must not resemble the marriage rite is just an alibi. What is the point of giving a blessing to people who are not willing to abandon the path of sin and do not even want to call sin sin? They actually receive a blessing to follow the road to hell. Moreover, it is also a grave sin against the second commandment.
As far as Bergoglio’s doctrinal declaration is concerned, whoever recognizes Jorge Bergoglio as the rightful Pope finds himself in an absurd situation. He must accept this doctrinal document as binding. The penalty for disobeying the Pope is excommunication – as provided in the document Pastor aeternus, proclaiming the dogma of papal infallibility of July 18, 1870.
This brings a sharp clash. Either this curse fell on Bergoglio for the sodomite anti-gospel, or on God’s Word, which forbids sodomy, i.e. de facto on God. This clearly revealed Bergoglio’s official rebellion against God. Those who obey Bergoglio’s teaching and submit to him are complicit in his public cursing of God, shielded by ecclesiastical authority. This absurd situation arose as a result of the fact that the papal office was occupied by an arch-heretic. The blame falls on the bishops who submitted to him and refuse to fulfill their duty to declare him a public heretic.
The doctrinal declaration Fiducia Supplicans is the corpus delicti proving Francis Bergoglio to be a manifest heretic who excommunicated himself from the Church and therefore could not be its head. This fact can no longer be discussed or disputed by dialectics or sophistry.
The question keeps coming up: Was Pope Francis a manifest heretic, or was he not? All the evidence points to the fact that he was.
Compiled from the BCP’s archives, dated December 19, 2023
Download: BCP: Was Pope Francis a public heretic or not? Part 6
