BCP: Was Pope Francis a public heretic or not? Part 4

Abolition of anything to the contrary of his motu proprio

Final quote from the motu proprio: “All that I have decreed in this Apostolic Letter motu proprio given, I order to have stable and lasting force, notwithstanding anything to the contrary.”

In his motu proprio, Bergoglio proclaims heresies and misleading doctrines that lead to apostasy, and by his authoritative statement he proved that he opposed (God) and exalted himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped. (cf. 2Th 2:3f)

Bergoglio introduced his own anti-gospel, for which he and those who accept his new heretical teaching are subject to God’s anathema according to Gal 1:8-9.

Quoting Francis: “… it is the particular task of theology to discover the Trinitarian imprint that makes the cosmos in which we live a web of relationships in which it is proper to every living being to tend toward another thing.”

Theology does not have the task of discovering a vague imprint, but of proclaiming God revealed in the Trinity with the goal of saving souls. This entails the necessity of receiving the Son of God as Savior. Bergoglio’s theology makes no mention of this necessity, let alone emphasizes this foundation. Bergoglio’s theology, which does not tend toward salvation in Jesus Christ but proclaims that it is proper to every living being to tend toward another thing, is not Christian theology. It is more of a Hindu maze that has nothing to do with the salvation of the soul.

Bergoglio uncritically emphasized dialogue with everyone. However, if dialogue replaces the mission, the result is not the salvation of souls, but merely trying to win people over – in other words, a kind of proselytism. What kind of dialogue did the martyrs engage in with their tormentors? If they had engaged in dialogue, they would have betrayed Christ. How does a dialogue between a wolf and a sheep end? What kind of dialogue can there be with someone who loves lies and evil and hates truth and virtue?

Quoting Francis: “… openly confronting everyone, believers and non-believers alike. Indeed, the need for dialogue is intrinsic to human beings and to the whole of creation…!”

Eve in Paradise openly confronted the serpent and it ended very tragically. Jesus, the apostles, and the Church Fathers did not engage in dialogue, but proclaimed the Gospel of salvation in the power of the Spirit. Instead of dialogue, they defended the faith. It is a gross deception and a crime to disrupt the true mission and replace it with dialogue. We see the negative fruits of dialogue today.

Quoting Francis: “Dialogue with other knowledge evidently presupposes … an awareness of the essential synodal … dimension of doing theology.”

The Apostle Paul points to the true source of knowledge: “I want you to have the full riches of complete understanding and know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. I tell you this so that no one may deceive you by fine-sounding arguments. … Live in Christ Jesus, rooted and built up in Him… Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.” (Col 2:2-8) We must beware lest Bergoglio cheat us through dialogue with other knowledge. We would pay for it with the loss of our own identity – that is, the loss of Christ and damnation of the soul.

Quoting Francis: “Ecclesial synodality therefore commits theologians to do theology in a synodal form, promoting among themselves the capacity to listen, dialogue, discern and integrate the multiplicity and variety” (LGBTQ).

If ecclesial synodality commits theologians to do theology in a synodal form, it means to dialogue with the spirit of sodomy and integrate the LGBTQ multiplicity and variety into theory and practice. If theologians do not do it this way, there is no more place for them in Bergoglio’s heretical sect, just as there is no place there for the Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit – the Spirit of truth.

To do theology, so to speak, without prayer, without repentance, and without the true foundations of faith, means replacing theology with heresiology.

The question keeps coming up: Was Pope Francis a manifest heretic, or was he not? All the evidence points to the fact that he was.

Compiled from the BCP’s archives, dated December 18, 2023

Download: BCP: Was Pope Francis a public heretic or not? Part 4