Pride of clericals – demoralization of the nation. 1) HALIK AND HOMOSEXUALISM

1) Halik and homosexualism

2) Halik contra President

3) Halik contra Batora

4) Halik and heresy

1) Halik and homosexualism

Pride of the Church representatives caused:

a) apostasy from God: “Although they knew God,… they exchanged the truth about God for a lie.” (Rom 1:21.25)

b) regard for pagan demons (Assisi): “… they worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator …” (v. 25)

c) punishment: homosexuality (v. 26-27)

A model of a heretic and apostate is homoideologist T. Halik.

In public, Halik acts as an opponent of gay marriages and, to some extent, of adoption of children by homosexuals. At the same time, however, he presents homosexuality as a kind of natural value. Thus he breaks down the protective barrier in people’s minds, which will cause the whole society to be contaminated by this immoral infection.

Quotation: “In my psychotherapeutic clinical practice and now in the practice of a confessor I have come to know closely the fate of many people with whom nature have played without their choice in such way, that the desire for intimacy draws them to people of the same sex.”

Response: Halik is silent about those with whom nature did not play – who opened to homosexuality, which is against nature, through their own or somebody else’s fault. They became slaves of this unnatural dependence behind which there are impure thoughts and impure spirituality. Halik is also silent about the fact that those who were born this way bear on themselves the consequences of the sins of their ancestors who opened themselves to occult spirituality and a false regard – idolatry. Halik himself promotes this pagan spirituality behind which is not the Spirit of Truth, whereby he became an advocate of homoideology.

Halik’s statement is not a statement of a Catholic priest-confessor, but rather of an atheistic psychotherapist or New Age ideologist. What Scripture calls sin and abomination, he qualifies as a morally neutral “desire for intimacy which draws to people of the same sex”. He does not say that this desire is sinful. Thus he places sin and sinful addiction in such light as if it were something interesting which deserves respect and recognition. Saying that he “has come to know closely the fate of many”, he arouses emotional sympathy. In fact, however, he undermines a clear and definite biblical but also a moral stance on this serious sin. He normalizes homosexuality, thus revoking God’s laws and God’s commandments. His attitude is not of a priest of Christ, but of the servant of Antichrist. His aim is not to bring people out of the darkness of sin and lie to the light of the Divine truth, out of the slavery of sinful dependence to true freedom, but quite the contrary. Behind Halik there is the spirit of anti-repentance, lie and manipulation.

Quotation: “I know about their difficulties and I would never dare to throw stones of damnation on them or on the quality of their emotional bonds with their partners.”

Response: Halik does not know nor does he want to know about the real difficulties of homosexuals. It is him who “throws stones of eternal damnation” on them and their partners by lying to them and not showing them the way out, i.e. true repentance – which as a priest he should do. He does not call the sin of homosexuality a sin nor does he point at the living Jesus Christ who died on Calvary and rose historically and really from the dead. Jesus not only forgives sin, but He also sets free those who are bound by sin. Thousands may bear testimony to their being healed of and delivered from homosexuality by Jesus! But Halik does not want to hear that; he calls it a sin of bigotry and prevents these people even from trying to be liberated from homosexuality and healed. Instead, he uncritically fantasizes about “the quality of their emotional bonds with their partners”. Why Halik does not also tell something about the true statistics on this “quality”? For example, in the U.S. an average homosexual changes 200-500 partners in the span of his life; in New York homosexuals partake in half of all murders; homosexuals make up over 50% of all cases of AIDS, 70% of all cases of hepatitis in the U.S., only in Los Angeles homosexuals sexually abused 30,000 children. Why does he not add, as for this quality of relationships, that homosexual perversion involves sadomasochism, so-called coprophilia – licking of partner’s faeces, or so-called golden showers during which they urinate on one another’s body etc.? About this “quality of emotional bonds” Halik is notoriously silent.

Quotation: “I did my best to ensure for them and their considerable problems larger space for more benign understanding in the society and especially in the Church and Christian circles.”

Response: That which looks as if it was Halik’s kindness and understanding, is in fact the biggest crime against these people because it gives them no way out. It is demonic cruelty built on lies and distortion of the Word of God, and not love.

If Hal?k does not precisely define what is and what is not “space for more benign understanding”, then according to him as well as according to homosexuals who refuse to call a sin a sin, it is a space for spiritual contamination of moral people and Christians with homosexuality. If he did his best to bring Christ to these people, it would be a praiseworthy effort of a Catholic priest! Halik, however, as a member of the Council of Wise in the EU did his best so that a homodictatorship be introduced in the EU by means of a gradual change of legislation. He also did his best to ensure in the Church and Christian circles larger space for subtle promotion of homosexuality. This Halik’s effort has resulted in annulment of both natural and divine laws, which is the work of the spirit of antichrist!

Quotation: “The efforts of fundamentalists to declare their (homosexuals’) very propensity to be a sin, to condemn them, to ‘cure’ them or to subject them to exorcisms as possessed by the devil, I consider a sin of bigotry against common sense, that great gift of God.”

Response: Halik is deceiving again here. Arrogant homosexual activists do not have just a hidden and passive propensity to sin. Moreover, they are very organized and intentionally penetrate into Christian communities in order to disintegrate them internally. Such people definitely refuse to do sincere repentance. Behind them there is the spirit of pride and perversity, which subverts the individual, destroys the institution of the family and brings a curse upon the whole nation. Halik refuses the true diagnosis, prohibits an effective spiritual and practical assistance, and even qualifies it as a crime. He masterfully imposes an attitude that a homosexual must remain a homosexual and does not need to repent. According to Halik no one is allowed to call the sin of homosexuality a sin! His false charity is the greatest cruelty to these people because he deprives them of whatever opportunity of salvation through repentance and true faith which gives space to God’s power. This faith separates one’s soul from an unclean spirit and then heals the wounded soul. Even the Lord Jesus cast out unclean spirits and the Apostles did the same in His power. Halik, however, calls it a sin of bigotry.

Halik’s policy is conducted in the spirit of antichrist. It contradicts Christ and His Gospel in its very root.

There are plenty of honest homosexuals who have been freed through a living faith in Christ and who bear a joyful testimony to it. On this fact Halik is silent.

Quotation: “I know a number of gays, especially in the intellectual and artistic circles, who are not anxious about their emotional focus and do not try to hide it…”

Response: Halik creates an impression that being a gay is a special privilege for intellectuals, artistic circles and more elite circles with whom he likes to communicate. Halik makes a sin into a fashion. This is not an attitude of a Catholic priest, but of an antichristian deceiver who deceives young and sincere people.

Quotation: “… nor would it occur to them to strive for contracting formal marriages…”

Response: Halik considers it a virtue that it does not occur to some homosexuals to contract formal marriages.

Europe has been shaped by Christianity for 2000 years. Christianity, on the basis of God’s laws and the Gospel, points out clearly the meaning of human suffering, provides clear and comprehensive answer to vital questions regarding good and evil, truth and lie, sin and virtue, life and death, but also highlights the question of God’s Judgement and life after death. The centre of Christianity is Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who became a redemptive sacrifice for our sins, rose from the dead and thus confirmed the truth of the Gospel and His own Divinity. Heretical priest Halik casts doubt on these basic truths and instead of God’s laws he promotes antilaws which lead to the genocide of Europe. T. Halik, therefore, is not only an ideologue of the EU’s Council of “the Wise” but also a heretic, and an international and mass criminal worse than fascists like Goebbels or Eichmann. Why? Because he sends millions of deceived and seduced souls to eternal death in hell. How is this happening? Through anti-Christian lies and enforcement of antilaws.

Quotation: “… and some of them even consider (just as I do) a general ‘right to adoption of children’ for same-sex couples to be somewhat irresponsible experimentation with children.”

Response: Adoption of children by homosexuals is the tyranny against children and their gradual demoralization and demonization. Halik uses the term “somewhat irresponsible experimentation with children”. How can one even admit some experimentation with children? Halik calls moral Mr L. Batora a fascist; however, he himself allows not only what was happening in concentration camps – human experimentation – but he even allows experimentation with children.

What does the term “general right to adoption of children for same-sex couples” mean? We ask: Since when is it general right? Halik produces an impression as if in the entire history of mankind it was something natural for homosexuals to adopt children. In fact, it is only another form of his lie by which he changes thinking of his readers by means of inaccurate statements and concealment of the nature of the truth. By the phrase “general right” he promotes a new standard and new pseudo-thinking.

Quotation: “People, whom I’m talking about, have enough natural self-esteem, self-criticism and other reasons to be proud than to need to publicly demonstrate pride in their homosexuality during the ‘pride parades’…”

Response: Halik masterfully includes in the catalogue of virtues, which one must be proud of, the sin of homosexuality. About the active homosexuals he says that they have enough “natural self-esteem, self-criticism, and other reasons to be proud”. Thus he stands in total opposition to God’s Word which calls homosexuality grave sin and abomination. The real virtues as courage to defend the truth, radicalism towards sin, loyalty to God’s law etc. Halik calls nauseating fundamentalism, bigotry and absurdity. However, sin and perversion he considers as “pride in one’s homosexuality”, “quality of emotional bonds”, “desire for intimacy with people of the same sex”… Thus he degrades not only Christian values but also the natural human relations that are build on pure friendship, mutual respect, human dignity and courage to stand against the tide and against the system of lie.

Quotation: “The fact that one is not morbidly ashamed of one’s own sexuality is good, but it does not need to lead to the opposite extreme when sexuality loses its natural protection of private and intimate things.”

Response: It is mean to create an impression as if the natural shyness of man who condemns evil and immorality was something morbid. Shyness serves as protection and leads to true dignity. However, the so-called Catholic priest by his demagogic approach deprives one of this natural self-defence which has every man – not only Christian but also unbeliever – and disparagingly declares it to be something morbid. In other words, he not only approves of the sin of homosexuality again but also of remaining in the sin and impenitence and, on top of it all, he chooses a noble concept for it: “protection of private and intimate matters”.

Quotation: “… Christian fundamentalists who know nothing about what contemporary genetics and sexology discovered about the origin of homosexual orientation are not able to distinguish between genetically determined sexual orientation and frivolous sexual experimentation of people capable of heterosexual relationships (to whom can be applied – unlike the former – biblical condemnation of ‘pederasts’) and would summarily send all to hell.”

Response: If someone committed a homosexual act, he committed a sin. It makes no difference whether one was born that way or became homosexual later. In both cases it is a sin. The person concerned must repent, if he wants to be saved. No one will be saved without repentance (Luke 13:3), whether Halik distinguishes it or not. As for hell, we remind that it is eternal and that God’s Word says that broad is the way that leads there. Halik is a false prophet who sends all who follow him on the broad way of his antigospel summarily to hell.

Quotation: “I cannot deny what I know about these things not only from theological but also psychological studies and especially from the many years of practice of clinical psychologist and confessor…”

Response: By his demagogical statements, Halik completely denies what is objectively known about homosexuality from both theological and also psychological point of view. He does not call homosexuality a sin, nor does he call this bondage an abomination. He evidently does not know that until recently homosexuality was registered by the WHO as a mental illness. Recently, this registration was cancelled – not from scientific but from political motives. When Halik as a confessor has an anti-biblical attitude towards homosexuality, then, naturally, he has never led anyone to repentance or liberation. He only abused the sacrament of confession to strengthen these people in sin and killed their conscience.

Quotation: “… the victims of ‘Pentecostal’ Christians who wanted to ‘heal’ them (homosexuals) from homosexuality ‘through the Holy Spirit’ on stadiums – and sometimes it ended with the suicide attempts of these ‘healed’.”

Response: Halik has never called homosexuals the victims of sinful addiction; however, all of a sudden he calls them victims of Pentecostal Christians. These Christians prayed for people who repented in earnest. They prayed not only for homosexuals but also for drug addicts, alcoholics and other people bound by addictions. In this prayer, the more so when people who want to be liberated repent in earnest, really works the Holy Spirit. If some of them fall into sin and bondage again, whereafter a suicidal temptation can arise, it cannot be attributed to Pentecostal Christians. Those whom Halik has strengthened in slavery to sin experience thanks to him a hell on earth and there is also hell after death in store for them. As for the suicide statistic, in America 50% of all suicides are committed by homosexuals. Halik notoriously conceals the fact that through conversion and repentance thousands were liberated from homosexuality and healed.

Quotation: “I think that the excerpt from the epistle to Romans should be applied to persons capable of heterosexual relationships who engage in homosexual acts to ‘diversify their sexual menu’.”

Response: Here Halik alibistically admits that bisexuality can be termed a sin; however, he approves of so-called innate homosexuality. The Scripture makes no such difference. It explicitly calls homosexuality an abomination and warns both individuals and society against it. The expression “diversify sexual menu” is a vocabulary of perverts.

According to the Epistle to the Romans (1:18-27), the sin of homosexuality is the fruit of human pride which rejects God and His laws and worships the creature and demons particularly revered in pagan religions. Halik advocates this spirit of paganism, the spirit of New Age.

Quotation: “Something different is homosexual orientation given by innate biological disposition. This disposition cannot be regarded as sinful in itself and the Church teaches that these people should be treated with understanding.”

Response: With regard to innate biological disposition or the so-called genetically inherited homosexuality, it has its spiritual root in the sin of one’s ancestors against the First Commandment (the sin of unbelief and idolatry). The curse, which is associated with the violation of the First Commandment, is manifested unto the third and fourth generation. However, God sets completely free from this slavery and curse those who repent in earnest.

Regarding innate biological disposition, once it is brought to completion in thought or deed, it is a sin. It is necessary that the confessor approaches penitents who want to repent in earnest with understanding. Those who would go to confession with no intention of repentance but of manipulation must be radically rejected. Similarly, every Christian must be radical and refuse to listen to gay stories that are aimed at seducing sympathetic rescuers. Owing to naive tolerance, these rescuers not only put in peril their health and earthly life because of exposure to AIDS disease but they also run the risk of losing eternal life.

Compiled by the Bishops’ Synod of the Ukrainian orthodox Greek-Catholic Church

Cc to: Prof. T. Halik; Mass media in the Czech Republic