Quote (Art.16): “One of the principal bodies in the history of the ecumenical movement is the World Council of Churches (WCC). The Georgian and Bulgarian Orthodox Churches withdrew membership from the WCC.”

Response: The World Council of Churches is an instrument of the Masonic NWO globalization policy and is controlled by it. It is sad that only the Georgian and Bulgarian Churches withdrew membership from it. The true Patriarch Irenaeus of Jerusalem as well as his predecessor had already before rejected participation in this Masonic structure. However, soon after Patriarch Irenaeus was removed by Patriarchs Kirill and Bartholomew. All the Orthodox Churches should withdraw membership from the WCC!

Quote (Art.5): “The bilateral theological dialogues that the Orthodox Church conducts today, as well as her participation in the movement for the restoration of Christian unity, are grounded in her Orthodox consciousness and the spirit of ecumenicity, and are aimed at seeking the lost Christian unity on the basis of the faith and tradition of the ancient Church of the Seven Ecumenical Councils.”

Response: The Vatican is in deep apostasy on grounds of heresies and syncretism. The phrases “theological dialogues” and “restoration of Christian unity” are a manipulation in that today they mean dialogues with heretics and unity with apostasy rather than with sound Christians. Both “theological dialogues” and “restoration of Christian unity” are de facto positive phrases which manipulate the faithful and draw them into the process of spiritual self-destruction. The Seven Councils fought against heresies, whereas this Council, seeking to unite with the apostate Vatican, opens the door to the greatest heresies. To argue that so-called unity will be restored on the basis of the faith and tradition is thus a gross lie intended to deceive the Orthodox faithful.

13 February 2016

To Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church

Dear Bishops of Russia,

an extraordinary situation has arisen. The meeting in Havana showed that Patriarch Kirill has betrayed not only the Orthodox Church but also the Russian nation. His gesture of unity with the apostate Pope Francis proved that Kirill is an ideological worker of the NWO who seeks to globalize the Church under the New Age and the Russian nation under the aegis of Freemasons. The meeting with Francis was preceded by the meeting in Chambésy (21-28 January 2016), where he and the apostate Patriarch Bartholomew approved a destructive programme of the Eighth Pan-Orthodox Council. They have masked everything with positive phrases.

The reaction to his meeting with the apostate Francis was an explosion of global euphoria, which is a sign that Kirill had fulfilled the NWO’s plan! The US government immediately issued an uncompromising threat to the Russian President that he must stop fighting against terrorism, otherwise there would be a third world war! This is a global manipulation against Russia, which is a crime! Thus, through his meeting, Kirill has jeopardized not only the contemporary Orthodox Church but also the Russian state.

On 12 February 2016, at the airport in Havana, Cuba, Pope Francis met with the Moscow Patriarch Kirill. They embraced each other as a sign of unity and signed a joint declaration. All pro-American media triggered a wave of worldwide euphoria. They built Kirill’s worldwide image as a peacemaker who seeks to unify East and West in the religious and political spheres. This is a fraud and manipulation! In fact, Kirill is under God’s anathema because he promotes heresies destroying the Church. His aim is not to establish peace; he is an instrument of American globalization policy against Russia. This is the reason why there is such euphoria of the American mass media over the gesture of their secret agent!

Through his gesture, NWO globalists pursue a political and ideological attack on the Orthodox Church and on President Putin, and thus on all Russia. Through various manipulations, they suggest to the public that President Putin should pattern himself on Kirill, i.e. let Russia be globalized by the US. Otherwise, he will supposedly cause a third world war. And then they blackmail the President into ceasing the fighting against ISIS terrorism in Syria, otherwise the US will deploy their troops in Syria. Thus the US make it clear that they defend and promote ISIS terrorism to achieve their globalization goals.

12 February 2016

Analysis of the published document “Relations of the Orthodox Church with the Rest of the Christian World”:

Quote (Art.1): “The Orthodox Church, being the One, Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, in her profound ecclesiastical consciousness firmly believes that she occupies a central place in matters relating to the promotion of Christian unity within the contemporary world.”

Response: This is not a matter of Christian unity but rather of unity with the apostasy of the Vatican which has brought down on itself God’s anathema. Why is the Orthodox Church today seeking to establish unity with the Vatican if the Vatican has betrayed the teaching of the Gospel, the Apostles and the Holy Tradition? Moreover, the Vatican promotes neopaganism through interreligious dialogue! Supposing the Orthodox Church is paving the way of this pseudo unity, it is not a unity on the basis of orthodoxy but on the basis of heresies, which is the way to destruction and the end of the Orthodox Church.

12 February 2016

The Eighth Pan-Orthodox Council, which is to take place on the feast of the Holy Spirit, 19 June 2016, will launch the process of expulsion of the Holy Spirit from the Orthodox Church. It will de facto be the beginning of gradual spiritual suicide – suicidium. The main initiator of the Synod is the apostate Patriarch Bartholomew and the apostate Patriarch Kirill. Both of them are under an anathema – God’s curse – according to Gal 1:8-9. Through “theological dialogues” with the apostate Vatican, they want the spirit of the New Age to infiltrate the entire Orthodox Church. The Pre-Council Conference conclusions are formulated in a positive light. However, they actually disguise the real intention, i.e. self-destruction of the Church as well as of the Russian and the Greek nation. Other Orthodox nations will likewise be drawn into this self-destruction process.

Merkel has enforced suicidal legislation and sodomism through an incomprehensible text of the Lisbon Treaty. A similar method of positive terms is applied by the Vatican globalists. Unfortunately, the apostate Patriarchs are in unity with them nowadays.

Further analysis of the theological and literary activity of T. Halík:

5. Method of an impersonal approach to the faith

Halík writes: “What I found offensive was the film’s (note: The Passion of the Christ by M. Gibson) Christological heresy. Our Lord’s act of salvation is presented as a heroic human deed. Jesus is portrayed in true American style as a champion, excelling in his endurance of pain, one who, in his bout with the devil, is knocked out a thousand times but gets back on his feet again – and at the end worthily mounts the victors podium.” (Night of the Confessor, 2006, p.152)

It is the height of blasphemy to compare the redemptive suffering of Christ to sadomasochism and to call our Saviour a champion, excelling in his endurance of pain.

Further analysis of the theological and literary activity of T. Halík:

4. Method of virtual reality

Halík writes: “The Resurrection is an event of an eschatological character – that is indicated by the expression “the third day”, which is not simply a chronological fact – bursting into time; it needed time to penetrate the hearts and minds of the disciples and bring light thereto, enabling them also to understand the meaning of Christ’s suffering and cross.” (Night of the Confessor, 2006, p.216)

Why is Halík so disturbed by the expression “the third day” in the Scripture? Because he tolerates no concrete facts and no reality. He floats in imagination, eschatology and virtual reality, and cannot bear a concrete reality. The third day is the third day; what does he mean to discover about it? Number three is number three and a day is a day. Every small child knows that third comes after first and second, and that a day is a day and not a week, month or year. And because he is not clear about it, he must invent a kind of knockout theory and so he says, in other words, that it was only on the third day that the apostles realized that the Lord Jesus had died three days before, and that was the resurrection in their minds which we are to believe in, as Halík tries to convince us.

Further analysis of the theological and literary activity of T. Halík:

3. Method of manipulation (deliberate vagueness)

Halík continues his manipulation of the fundamental Christian truths – the death and Resurrection of Christ: “Or (it can be read) as a drama in one act in which both versions of the story take place at the same time. Nevertheless it is the second interpretation, the ‘parallel’ one, that is actually reading with the eyes of faith. Faith here means two things, however: on the one hand, the realization that the story is paradoxical (that the other aspect of the story, ‘the resurrection’, is a reinterpretation of the first, not its subsequent happy outcome)…” (Night of the Confessor, 2006)

This is illogical nonsense cloaked in obscure language, and Halík makes great mysticism of it. Those who do not believe in this mysticism are, in his opinion, totally primitive because: “…it is the second interpretation, the ‘parallel’ one, that is actually reading with the eyes of faith.” It means that if, reading the Gospel, you fail to fabricate total nonsense out of it which does not correspond with the reality, e.g. that death and resurrection is one and the same thing, and if you then fail to read this nonsense with the eyes of faith, you lack faith.

Catholics want to be clear about whether the Catholic priest Halík is a true-Catholic priest or a heretic. He cannot be both this and that, even though he claims to be.

The second method used by Halík is:

2. Method of ridicule

Halík ridicules the truths of faith, and even calls the Resurrection of Christ a myth and fairy tale with a happy ending.

Quote: “The Easter story can be read in two quite different ways. Either as a drama in two acts, where in the first act a just and innocent man is sentenced to death and executed, and then, in the second act, is resurrected and accepted by God. … In the first interpretation the ‘Resurrection’ is the happy ending, and the entire story is a typical myth or optimistic fairy tale.” (Night of the Confessor, 2006)

Who is the priest Tomáš Halík and who do people say that he is? He acts as an advocate and saviour of Christianity despised by him, and he allegedly raises it to a “higher” level. Halík is a member of the Masonic Committee of Wise Persons in the EU. His dream is to occupy the post of President at the Prague Castle or at least the post of the Archbishop of Prague. Cardinal Vlk has always approved of his heretical activities and assigned him to pastoral care of the university youth, whom Halík has systematically infected with the spirit of Buddhism. The Katolický týdeník (Catholic Weekly) publishes his articles and advertises his books. The common believers therefore regard them as the voice of the true Catholic Church.

Many Catholics, however, rightly ask the question: Is Tomáš Halík a true Catholic priest or a heretic? What methods does he use?

1. Method of professional lying

Halík undermines the reader’s or listener’s solid foundation of the saving faith. He forces the defenders of orthodoxy to be the first to formulate his hidden heresies.

17 January 2016

14 January 2016

Patriarch Kirill is known to promote interreligious dialogue with Muslims, and all his closest team takes it as a priority. The promotion of globalization interreligious dialogue after the pattern of the Vatican is the aim of the 8^th Pan-Orthodox Synod. Through the Second Vatican Council, this dialogue opened the door to Islamization of Western Europe connected with terrorism. Without the Council, Islamization would be impossible. Today it is in US interests to enforce this globalization dialogue in the Russian Orthodox Church, too, with the intention of bringing about its internal disintegration, just as it happened in the Catholic Church.

Last year marked the 100th anniversary of the genocide in Armenia. It was expected that Patriarch Kirill would clearly, before the whole Orthodox Church, point out the Holocaust and make a concrete gesture to honour the memory of the Armenian martyrs. He made no such gesture in the jubilee year. In 2015, when Islamic terrorists cut the throats of Christians in Egypt and the whole world viewed the video recordings of the incident, both the Vatican and Kirill were silent; they neither stood in defence of the Christian martyrs nor condemned the Islamic terrorists. President Putin was not silent on it but expressed the need to stand in defence of Christians.

12 January 2016

The Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate, by authority of the apostolic and prophetic office, hereby proclaims the year 2016 a year of mutual forgiveness among the Slavonic nations of Poland, Ukraine and Russia.

Reason: If we call ourselves Christians, we are obliged to follow the example of our Lord Jesus Christ. When His hands were nailed to the cross, He prayed: “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they do!” He thus made it clear that He knew that those who caused His death were deceived by the spirit of lies. The “Our Father” contains a petition: “(Father), forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.” Jesus adds to this petition: “If you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive you.” (Mt 6:14-15) Jesus does not speak about who is guilty and who is not. He sets only one requirement – forgive! He says in another place: “Forgive and you will be forgiven.” “With the same measure you use, it will be measured to you.” (Mk 4:24) If we have our own measure of justice, none of us will stand on the Day of Judgment. But if we accept the measure of mercy, it means that we forgive, God will not judge us by justice but according to His mercy. This is the only way to the salvation of the individual and society.

In 1965, the Second Vatican Council declared a heresy about the Christian God and the Muslim Allah being one and the same.

Quotation from Vatican II (Nostra Aetate): “The Church has also a high regard for the Muslims. They worship God, who is the One…”

Response: The Church always had a horror of the bloody Islamic invasion rather than a regard for it. A radical change took place at the Council. Instead of emphasizing the need for prudence, the Council emphasized a suicidal regard, and even voted on and declared a heresy saying that the God of Christians, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, is supposedly bloodthirsty Allah! This is a lie and blasphemy! One cannot vote on what is and what is not true! You cannot vote on whether someone is dead or alive. Vote does not change the reality! The Council’s wicked heresy about the God of Christians being identical with the Allah of Muslims denied the fundamental truth of the faith and deceived all Catholics!